We have 16 different channels and in perspective there might be necessity to switch live stream periodically simultaneously in all 16 channels. Like music fades out and live come in. When all 16 channels are running in single liquidsoap process solution seems to be obvious, but what about separate liquidsoap processes, I guess - not possible?
Davit Barbakadze On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, David Baelde <david.bae...@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > I'm glad your problem is solved. > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Davit Barbakadze <jaya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> But will that mean that for every liquidsoap process I will need a separate >> harbor? >> Is it possible to interrupt all running processes with single live input? >> Or I will need to run all channels on single process to achieve that? > > I'm not sure what you're asking (particularly about the interruption) > but I'll try to clarify: you can have several instances of liquidsoap, > each instance running harbor on several ports. Obviously, two > instances cannot run have harbor inputs listening on the same port of > the same machine. This was the case in older versions already. > > Cheers, > > David > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
