Hello
I have a considerable amount of broadcasters that have issues with streaming
to an input harbor. Their broadcast frequently switches between a local
source and the input harbor. After a lot of research a few of them do have
crappy home networks, and bandwidth issues, which explains some of the
problems. The others seem to have no bandwidth issues, but I am wondering if
Liquidsoap is input harbor more sensitive to network latency than Icecast
and Shoutcast. So maybe Liquidsoap has a smaller buffer, and is prone to
thinking the live broadcast has been disconnected much earlier than
Shoutcast or Icecast might. Is that a reasonable theory? For now I'm going
to test it by having some live stream directly to an Icecast server and see
if their problems go away.
--
=========================================
Brandon Casci
Loudcaster
http://loudcaster.com
=========================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
