Right now we have a trunk version in place. I'm not sure of the version. I
will check, it's from withing the last 3 months though.
I was not aware of logging specific to the input harbor. Can please you
point me to the docs?
The logs currently don't show network activity, just switching between
sources. Do we need to increase the log level, or would this data show up
in the input harbor log?
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Romain Beauxis <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> 2011/4/25 Romain Beauxis <[email protected]>:
> > Le 25 avril 2011 15:02, Brandon Casci <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >> Hello
> >
> > Hi Brandon,
> >
> >> I have a considerable amount of broadcasters that have issues with
> streaming
> >> to an input harbor. Their broadcast frequently switches between a local
> >> source and the input harbor. After a lot of research a few of them do
> have
> >> crappy home networks, and bandwidth issues, which explains some of the
> >> problems. The others seem to have no bandwidth issues, but I am
> wondering if
> >> Liquidsoap is input harbor more sensitive to network latency than
> Icecast
> >> and Shoutcast. So maybe Liquidsoap has a smaller buffer, and is prone to
> >> thinking the live broadcast has been disconnected much earlier than
> >> Shoutcast or Icecast might. Is that a reasonable theory? For now I'm
> going
> >> to test it by having some live stream directly to an Icecast server and
> see
> >> if their problems go away.
> >
> > What version of liquidsoap are you using?
>
> The reason I am asking this is because I also suspect something in the
> recent versions of liquidsoap.
> One thing you can do to monitor the issue is to use the logfile
> parameter of input.harbor. This creates a file which contains the
> length of the input buffer over time which can be plotted, in order to
> get an idea of what's going on..
>
> Also, you should check the logs for messages of the type:
> "No network activity for 1 second(s)."
> If those messages happen a lot and the graph of the input buffer goes
> to zero, then the problem is on the networking side..
>
> > Romain
> >
> >> --
> >> =========================================
> >> Brandon Casci
> >> Loudcaster
> >> http://loudcaster.com
> >> =========================================
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
> >> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
> >> management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
> >> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Savonet-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
> management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
> _______________________________________________
> Savonet-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
>
--
=========================================
Brandon Casci
Loudcaster
http://loudcaster.com
=========================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
