Ah yes. Type safety to all, and to all a good night. gem
-----Original Message----- From: ljknews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed Dec 14 11:36:20 2005 To: Secure Coding Mailing List Subject: RE: [SC-L] Intel turning to hardware for rootkit detection At 9:14 AM -0500 12/14/05, Gary McGraw wrote: > No, that's a copy of stackguard. The real problem with all of these > approaches is that they don't fix the root problem. Finding and removing > buffer overflow conditions with a static analysis tool is far superior. But still better is using a programming language that does not allow buffer overflows. -- Larry Kilgallen _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Cigital, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or its contents. Thank You. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
