scheme-reports  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] I just signed “Speaker of the Lok Sabha Shrimati Meira Kumar: Send the RTI (Amendment) Bill, 2013 to a Standing Committee/Select Committee ” Nataraj S Narayan
• [Scheme-reports] boolean=? Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] boolean=? Erik Falor
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] boolean=? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers Joseph Wayne Norton
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers Joseph Wayne Norton
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers Joseph Wayne Norton
• [Scheme-reports] We can stop talking about licensing now Musical Notation
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Is R6RS in the public domain? Hikari Boulders
• [Scheme-reports] You all don't need to do anything to change the licensing Musical Notation
• [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Musical Notation
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Musical Notation
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John David Stone
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Kevin Wortman
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Hikari Boulders
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John David Stone
  • [Scheme-reports] Stop, please! Musical Notation
• [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 112, Environment inquiry John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] SRFI 111, Boxes, added to R7RS-large John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Chris Hanson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Chris Hanson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Chris Hanson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through John Cowan
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Andrew Robbins
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Kevin Wortman
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Noah Lavine
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Alexey Radul
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Marijn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Alexey Radul
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Marijn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Roderic Morris
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Kevin Wortman
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Alexey Radul
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Kevin Wortman
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Kevin Wortman
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes Taylan Ulrich B.
• [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility Christian Stigen Larsen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility Alex Shinn
  • [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility William D Clinger
• [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alexey Radul
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Re: file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Daniel Villeneuve
• [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Andy Wingo
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate will
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedure equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 41, Issue 4 Gerald Jay Sussman
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Noah Lavine
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Kevin Millikin
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Taylan Ulrich B.
• [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Ray Dillinger
  • [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate xacc.ide
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alexey Radul
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
• [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Steering Committee requests one more draft of the R7RS small language document will
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alexey Radul
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Biep
• [Scheme-reports] Updated sets pre-SRFI and implementation John Cowan
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Description of self-evaluation is a bit too terse Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Description of self-evaluation is a bit too terse John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions Taylan Ulrich B.
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros? Sanel Zukan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros? Sanel Zukan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] voting has ended will
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] voting has ended John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] [[email protected]: Fwd: Ratification R7RS] John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] ADMIN: open posting on the WG2 mailing list begins John Cowan
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Post-plebiscite issues Vincent Manis
• [Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R/RS-small (ratification vote) Juergen Lorenz
• [Scheme-reports] Two Informal Comments on r7rs Small, draft 9 Jay Sulzberger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Two Informal Comments on r7rs Small, draft 9 John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote Kevin Wortman
  • [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote Alex Queiroz
  • [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote David Kendal
  • [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote Seth Alves
• [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Daniel Hartwig

• Earlier messages
• Later messages