Tom Hoffman wrote: > I've been working on a set of slides that explain how we're modeling > curriculum and assessment in SchoolTool. This reflects the work that > Stephan Richter and I have done in conjunction with Paul Carduner and > the CanDo team. We feel that we've got an underlying model that > allows both traditional and standards/outcomes/competency based > assessment to share a common foundation. > > Nothing is cast in stone at this point, and your feedback is welcome.
Good work! Compared to version 0.3 particularly the introduction of 'evidence' and 'activity' objects is a benefit. Somehow I do not feel quite comfortable with the term 'activity', since activity is more used in the context of learning / teaching activity. A more precise term in German would probably be 'Leistung' which may be translated as 'accomplishment' or something synonymous (knowing that there will always be discussion on terms.). Referring to Mike's posting the relationship between requirement and evaluation/activity needs not only to be one-to-many but many-to-many as it seems rather theoretical that in competency tracking a given requirement is linked just to a single activity or its evaluation respectively and vice versa. Robert --------------------------------- Robert Kraemer elive Learning Design Dennis-Gabor-Str. 2 14469 Potsdam (Germany) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------www.elive-ld.com- _______________________________________________ Schooltool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schooltool.org/mailman/listinfo/schooltool
