I agree with Alan... anyways if something is missing can be ported to the merged version.
But I think we need to keep one version, one effort. Saludos / Best regards Mario Lacunza Email:: mlacu...@gmail.com Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/ OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/ Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/ Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/ Google Talk / Y! messenger / Skype: mlacunzav MSN: mlacun...@hotmail.com El 15/03/13 13:08, Alan Whiteman escribió: > On 03/15/2013 10:26 AM, Ben St-Pierre wrote: >> I just replied to a message by Alan on another list; >> >> So now we areback to square one. >> >>> Steveand Fulvio are scid admins but no merge will be performed.Because this >>> squabblehas failed to resolve what should have been an important milestone >>> for the project, I think, for the most part, scid will continue to lagway >>> behind scidvspc in terms of usability and feature set.This will lead the >>> scid project to continue to stagnate (much like it has in the past two >>> years.) >>> I propose, as a mere user, that Steve take over as the project leadandguide >>> scid on the right direction. >> It bounced, since I'm not registered over there. >> I thought it was on the Scid Users' List. >> >> Sorry about that. >> >> Here is my response anyway: >> >> *** >> >> Thank you, Alan, for confirming that there is a need for an agreement >> among Scid's developers. I think we're closer to an agreement than the >> underling message conveyed by that comment. (This comment should not >> have been renamed, btw, since it belongs to the previous thread.) >> >> Since Alan wants some reinsurance, here's an informal proposal for an >> agreement between Steven and Fulvio. >> >> 1. Steven updates the svn code and archive what is there. >> 2. Fulvio updates the git code. >> 3. We rename the two versions in a way that users could see that the >> alternative. >> 4. We let Fulvio, Steven, and other interested coders negotiate the merge. >> >> This proposal is based on the following facts: >> >> - The svn (Subversion) code of scid.sourforge.net is deprecated. >> - The git code is the most recent code, and is what Fulvio wants to preserve. >> - Fulvio agrees to update the git code. >> - Steven shows willingness to lead a community-based project. >> - Nothing gets deleted, everything gets clarified. >> >> If these facts are not correct, the proposal becomes moot. >> If these facts are correct, I believe there's no need for Alan nor >> anyone else to worry about Scid's leadership. >> >> *** >> >> Here's a silly idea for release names that I got while cleaning up the >> kitchen: >> >> Code names that associate World Champions' names with the main developer's >> era. >> >> So we could have an historical release, Shane's last version, which >> could be called Scid Steinitz (or Wilhelm). >> >> We could have Pascal latest version, I believe the on in the git >> repository, which could be called Scid Lasker. >> >> We could have Steven's latest version, i.e. scidvspc or scidvsmac, >> which could be called Scid Capablanca (too bad there's a Scid Jose >> already). >> >> On the download page, we could maintain these three flavours as >> executables. We would need at least Scid Lasker and Scid Capa. >> >> *** >> >> >From the user's perspective, here's how it would look, if we have that >> >tomorrow: >> >> - Those who want a docking mode download Scid Lasker. >> - Those who want a fast and clean version download Scid Capa. >> >> This might be quite foolproof, unless Douglas Adams is right about fools. >> >> I could make screenshot if need be. >> >> Fulvio, Steven, please tell me what you think. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar >> _______________________________________________ >> Scid-users mailing list >> Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users >> >> > Ben, > > Svn vs git is an issue that should be resolved firstly since one cannot > have a community of developers work in a single project in two channels. > It sounds messy. > > At the same time I don't agree that there should be two versions of scid > equally billed as options (similar to Linux distros) because scid and > scidvspc have differences beyond a couple of features. Scidvspc is a far > better, faster, and more complete implementation. > > Once Steve fixes the docking feature in scidvspc, what's left for old scid? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar > _______________________________________________ > Scid-users mailing list > Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
