2008/5/5 Garth Corral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>
> On May 5, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Pascal Georges wrote:
> > Maybe there are things I did not get, but I don't see the point in
> > packaging data and exec separately : I have some dependencies
> > between data and some features (training, books), and I'd prefer
> > things to come in one simple package. I don't think a package about
> > 10 MB is too big.
> >
> I generally agree with you about not wanting to do this.  I'm used to
> working with systems that segregate third-party packages into their
> own hierarchy (FreeBSD, Darwinports) and I forget that linux distros/
> packaging systems sometimes mix them in with system installed things
> (in /usr/bin, for instance).  It is a fair point, however, that this
> is something that is now possible and wouldn't be with my proposed
> change.  That certainly wasn't my intention.
>
> I'll leave to you two to decide about what is appropriate and, in the
> mean time, try to think of a way to accommodate both.
>

Great. I commited your patches into CVS as 95% of it is ok (and this will
help me to start from that base). So we have time to think about the 5% left
: @SHAREDIR@ in config.tcl.conf.
I tested on Windows and I got no problem.

Could you contact Robert Hyatt for the 2 changes needed to compile Crafty on
MacOs / x86 ? It's good feedback to engines' developers.
.
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to