Benoit St-Pierre, czwartek, 26 czerwca 2008: >>Moreover I prefer the reference "Spassky Fischer 1972, round 3" than "game >> my_huge_ref_db:v12-12345678", because if I copy a game from a base to >> another "Spassky Fischer 1972, round 3" is still valid. Not "game >> my_huge_ref_db:v12-12345678".
>What do you do if you have the Gligoric annotated game, and the Kasparov >one, your Togofied one, and all the drafts about the game ? What do you do >if you have ten snapshots (fragments) from this game ? >And : >> - as a human, I prefer "Spassky Fischer 1972, round 3" >> - as a computer, I don't need the UID. >As a human, I prefer a UID that makes me generate the exact list of games >and snapshots I want. As a computer, if I am not using UID, I am working >against everything that is thought in a course about database concepts. As a human, I prefer something that works to something that is elegantly designed, but doesn't work. It looks to me like we are trying to find a General Solution to Chess Database instead of just doing something that is reasonably easy to implement and already works for Chess Assistant and ChessBase training databases. -- Michal Rudolf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
