2008/6/27 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I strongly DISAGREE with Michal on UIDs. These work and once established
> are well accepted. A prominent examples is DOI for scientific literature
> e.g. Besides I come from a discipline where you use to say "you should check
> this paper by Mueller" (Michals approach so far, unfortunately searching for
> the paper by Mueller is impossible) added by "I mean hep-ph/0107123". And
> everybody in this community knows how to handle that. It can't be shorter
> and more precise to the point than just to give the hep-number...
Just to sum up on UID (and try to conclude), from an IT point of view :
1. Complexity (cost of the code) : extremely high
2. Added value (feature for the end user) : from 0 (Michal's and me) to high
(Alexander and Benoit)
So I propose that first criteria (cost of UIDs) simply sets the priority of
this point to very low.
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
