Hello Roy,
I've already fixed this issue.
I'm waiting that Pascal is 
back to give him the new sources, but you can be sure that the history 
mode in analysis window will be restored.

Bye.
Giorgio.

>----
Messaggio originale----
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 4-lug-2008 
9.00
>A: <[email protected]>
>Ogg: Re: [Scid-users] Scid-
users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
>
>I would like to request that an option 
be created that will allow the Engine output window to function like 
the Chessbase GUI analysis window (i.e. scroll the results of the 
analysis as each ply is searched; the time to reach a given ply and the 
PV for that ply is not overwritten by the next ply's PV but rather the 
previous ply PV is preserved in a scrolling window). If this is not 
possible, I will cease to use SCID as it is useless for me without this 
(previously the default!) behavior. Every chess GUI I have ever seen 
has this option (except not anymore for SCID).
>
>Thanks,
>
>Roy
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sourceforge.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: scid-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 2:01:55 PM
>Subject: Scid-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
>
>Send Scid-users mailing 
list submissions to
>    [email protected]
>
>To 
subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    https:
//lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>or, via email, send 
a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sourceforge.net
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>    
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>When replying, please edit 
your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Scid-
users digest..."
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: precompiled binaries 
(Mikhail Kalenkov)
>   2. Re: precompiled binaries (Alexander Wagner)
>   3. Re: DGTDRV in Debian distro? (W. van den Akker)
>   4. Re: 
precompiled binaries (W. van den Akker)
>   5. Re: DGTDRV in Debian 
distro? (W. van den Akker)
>   6. Xfcc & The Big Competitor(tm) 
(Alexander Wagner)
>   7. Debian packages for scid 3.6.24 (Oliver 
Korff)
>
>
>
>-----Inline Message Follows-----
>
>build the Fedora RPM 
from the scid source. Do you see a way
>to get this? Something like 
configure --fedora or the like
>that results in an RPM in the end? 
(Willem: --debian would
>be another target.)
>The most straight and 
easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM is grabbing source RPM (http:
//katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run 
command
>$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm
>source RPM file 
is archive with scid sources (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, 
ratings_2008_4.zip, spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and 
installation script. I guess that source RPM file just realize your 
idea with --fedora configure option in slightly different way.
>  
>
> 
But we should
>discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back.
>ok. 
>
>Mikhail Kalenkov.
>
>
>
>
>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>Hi!
>
>
>Alexander Wagner wrote: 
>
>
>
>Is it reasonable to put 
precompiled binaries for popular
>distributions on the sf project page?
>
>
>IMHO the best way would be for scid to make it into the
>Fedora 
distribution. 
>I will think on this subject. 
> 
>The other way would 
be an easy way to
>build the Fedora RPM from the scid source. Do you 
see a way
>to get this? Something like configure --fedora or the like
>that results in an RPM in the end? (Willem: --debian would
>be another 
target.)
>The most straight and easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM 
is grabbing source RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.
fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run command
>$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-
3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm
>source RPM file is archive with scid sources 
(scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, 
spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and installation script. I 
guess that source RPM file just realize your idea with --fedora 
configure option in slightly different way.
>  
>
> But we should
>discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back.
>ok. 
>
>Mikhail Kalenkov.
>
>
>
>
>-----Inline Message Follows-----
>
>build 
the Fedora RPM from the scid source. Do you see a way
>to get this? 
Something like configure --fedora or the like
>that results in an RPM 
in the end? (Willem: --debian would
>be another target.)
>The most 
straight and easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM is grabbing source 
RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my 
case) and run command
>$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm
>source RPM file is archive with scid sources (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, 
photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple 
patches and installation script. I guess that source RPM file just 
realize your idea with --fedora configure option in slightly different 
way.
>  
>
> But we should
>discuss this here and also with Pascal once 
he's back.
>ok. 
>
>Mikhail Kalenkov.
>
>
>
>--- original Nachricht 
Ende ----
>MessageHello Mikhail!
>
>I see your point with the src-rpm. 
However, I think a binary rpm distribution has another target user. 
Mainly, binary rpms, debs and whatever address users that do not want 
to build the software but just use it. Especially in the scid community 
I'd guess that there're more chess fans than computer geeks. Therefore, 
I'd say that a src-rpm should be availble but does not address this 
group.
>
>With my --fedora configure option I tought more in the 
direction on "how to go to this src-rpm, and then build it".
>
>In 
other words, I think it would be nice if the default scid source offers 
a way to build a package for specific distributions. This does _not_ 
make a binary distribution obsolete but is more thought in the 
direction to ease up the src-rpm, src-deb, src-tgz and whatever 
packages.
>
>Additionally, building a binary package always requires 
the proper build environment. In your case Fedora 9. Or put the other 
way round: I could generate a binary package for Debian 4 but non for 
Fedora 9. I'd not even be able to build a binary package for Debian 
unstable myself. And this is the reason why I'd say that contributed 
binary builds are:
>
>1. a great service for the users
>2. should be 
hosted on linked sites from people who have this build environment, 
know the packaging how-to of their distribution and so on.
>3. could be 
used to offer the bleeding edge of development to all users (hence an 
addendum to the packages hopefully provided by the distributions as 
such)
>
>So, packages like those you built will always be complementary 
to a package offered by the distribution as such.
>
>
>----- original 
Nachricht --------
>
>Betreff: Re: [Scid-users] precompiled binaries
>Gesendet: Mi, 02. Jul 2008
>Von: Mikhail Kalenkov
>
>
>The other way 
would be an easy way to
>build the Fedora RPM from the scid source. Do 
you see a way
>to get this? Something like configure --fedora or the 
like
>that results in an RPM in the end? (Willem: --debian would
>be 
another target.)
>The most straight and easiest way to build Fedora 
binary RPM is grabbing source RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-
3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run command
>$rpmbuild --rebuild 
scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm
>source RPM file is archive with scid sources 
(scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, 
spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and installation script. I 
guess that source RPM file just realize your idea with --fedora 
configure option in slightly different way.
>  
>
> But we should
>discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back.
>ok. 
>
>Mikhail Kalenkov.
>
>
>
>--- original Nachricht Ende ----
>_______________________________________________
>Scid-users mailing 
list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.
net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>
>
>
>      
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
>and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.
net/community/cca08_______________________________________________
>Scid-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>https:
//lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to