Hello Alexander,
for sure I do it, so you can give me a feedback soon.
I will send you the sources this evening (I don't have them in office).
About the upload to CVS, I don't know what Pascal have in mind (if the 
modifications are ok, if wait some time before releasing them, and so 
on...), but for me there is no problem.

Bye.
Giorgio.

>----Messaggio 
originale----
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 4-lug-2008 
12.18
>A: "Giorgio Bellegotti"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com>
>Cc: <[email protected]>
>Ogg: Re: [Scid-users] R: 
Re:  Scid-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
>
>Hello!
>
>In case you could 
also send me your sources for upload into cvs. I do not want to 
interfere in your and Pascals work, I just do not know when he will 
return.
>
>----- original Nachricht --------
>
>Betreff: [Scid-users] 
R: Re:  Scid-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
>Gesendet: Fr, 04. Jul 2008
>Von: Giorgio Bellegotti<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Hello Roy,
>> I've 
already fixed this issue.
>> I'm waiting that Pascal is 
>> back to 
give him the new sources, but you can be sure that the history 
>> mode 
in analysis window will be restored.
>> 
>> Bye.
>> Giorgio.
>> 
>> 
>----
>> Messaggio originale----
>> >Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>Data: 4-lug-2008 
>> 9.00
>> >A: <[email protected]>
>> 
>Ogg: Re: [Scid-users] Scid-
>> users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
>> >
>> 
>I would like to request that an option 
>> be created that will allow 
the Engine output window to function like 
>> the Chessbase GUI 
analysis window (i.e. scroll the results of the 
>> analysis as each 
ply is searched; the time to reach a given ply and the 
>> PV for that 
ply is not overwritten by the next ply's PV but rather the 
>> previous 
ply PV is preserved in a scrolling window). If this is not 
>> 
possible, I will cease to use SCID as it is useless for me without 
this 
>> (previously the default!) behavior. Every chess GUI I have 
ever seen 
>> has this option (except not anymore for SCID).
>> >
>> 
>Thanks,
>> >
>> >Roy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message ----
>> 
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> sourceforge.net" <scid-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: scid-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net
>> >Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 2:01:55 PM
>> >Subject: Scid-users 
Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
>> >
>> >Send Scid-users mailing 
>> list 
submissions to
>> >    [email protected]
>> >
>> >To 
>> 
subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> >    https:
>> //lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>> >or, via email, 
send 
>> a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> >    scid-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> sourceforge.net
>> >
>> >You can reach the person 
managing the list at
>> >    
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >When replying, please edit 
>> your Subject line so it is more 
specific
>> >than "Re: Contents of Scid-
>> users digest..."
>> 
>Today's Topics:
>> >
>> >   1. Re: precompiled binaries 
>> (Mikhail 
Kalenkov)
>> >   2. Re: precompiled binaries (Alexander Wagner)
>> >   
3. Re: DGTDRV in Debian distro? (W. van den Akker)
>> >   4. Re: 
>> 
precompiled binaries (W. van den Akker)
>> >   5. Re: DGTDRV in Debian 
>> distro? (W. van den Akker)
>> >   6. Xfcc & The Big Competitor(tm) 
>> (Alexander Wagner)
>> >   7. Debian packages for scid 3.6.24 
(Oliver 
>> Korff)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Inline Message Follows-----
>> >
>> >build the Fedora RPM 
>> from the scid source. Do you see a 
way
>> >to get this? Something like 
>> configure --fedora or the like
>> >that results in an RPM in the end? 
>> (Willem: --debian would
>> 
>be another target.)
>> >The most straight and 
>> easiest way to build 
Fedora binary RPM is grabbing source RPM (http:
>> //katrine.lpi.
ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run 
>> command
>> >$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm
>> >source RPM file 
>> is archive with scid sources (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, 
>> ratings_2008_4.zip, spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and 
>> installation script. I guess that source RPM file just realize your 
>> idea with --fedora configure option in slightly different way.
>> 
>  
>> >
>> > 
>> But we should
>> >discuss this here and also with 
Pascal once he's back.
>> >ok. 
>> >
>> >Mikhail Kalenkov.
>> >
>> >
>> 
>
>> >
>> >-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>> >
>> >Hi!
>> >
>> >
>> >Alexander Wagner wrote: 
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Is it reasonable to 
put 
>> precompiled binaries for popular
>> >distributions on the sf 
project page?
>> >
>> >
>> >IMHO the best way would be for scid to make 
it into the
>> >Fedora 
>> distribution. 
>> >I will think on this 
subject. 
>> > 
>> >The other way would 
>> be an easy way to
>> >build 
the Fedora RPM from the scid source. Do you 
>> see a way
>> >to get 
this? Something like configure --fedora or the like
>> >that results in 
an RPM in the end? (Willem: --debian would
>> >be another 
>> target.)
>> >The most straight and easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM 
>> is 
grabbing source RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.
>> 
fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run command
>> >$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-
>> 3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm
>> >source RPM file is archive with scid 
sources 
>> (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, 
>> spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and installation script. 
I 
>> guess that source RPM file just realize your idea with --fedora 
>> configure option in slightly different way.
>> >  
>> >
>> > But we 
should
>> >discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back.
>> 
>ok. 
>> >
>> >Mikhail Kalenkov.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Inline 
Message Follows-----
>> >
>> >build 
>> the Fedora RPM from the scid 
source. Do you see a way
>> >to get this? 
>> Something like configure 
--fedora or the like
>> >that results in an RPM 
>> in the end? 
(Willem: --debian would
>> >be another target.)
>> >The most 
>> 
straight and easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM is grabbing source 
>> RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my 
>> case) and run command
>> >$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.
rpm
>> >source RPM file is archive with scid sources (scid-3.6.24.tar.
bz2, 
>> photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, spelling_2008_4.zip), some 
simple 
>> patches and installation script. I guess that source RPM 
file just 
>> realize your idea with --fedora configure option in 
slightly different 
>> way.
>> >  
>> >
>> > But we should
>> >discuss 
this here and also with Pascal once 
>> he's back.
>> >ok. 
>> >
>> 
>Mikhail Kalenkov.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--- original Nachricht 
>> Ende 
----
>> >MessageHello Mikhail!
>> >
>> >I see your point with the src-
rpm. 
>> However, I think a binary rpm distribution has another target 
user. 
>> Mainly, binary rpms, debs and whatever address users that do 
not want 
>> to build the software but just use it. Especially in the 
scid community 
>> I'd guess that there're more chess fans than 
computer geeks. Therefore, 
>> I'd say that a src-rpm should be 
availble but does not address this 
>> group.
>> >
>> >With my --fedora 
configure option I tought more in the 
>> direction on "how to go to 
this src-rpm, and then build it".
>> >
>> >In 
>> other words, I think 
it would be nice if the default scid source offers 
>> a way to build a 
package for specific distributions. This does _not_ 
>> make a binary 
distribution obsolete but is more thought in the 
>> direction to ease 
up the src-rpm, src-deb, src-tgz and whatever 
>> packages.
>> >
>> 
>Additionally, building a binary package always requires 
>> the proper 
build environment. In your case Fedora 9. Or put the other 
>> way 
round: I could generate a binary package for Debian 4 but non for 
>> 
Fedora 9. I'd not even be able to build a binary package for Debian 
>> 
unstable myself. And this is the reason why I'd say that contributed 
>> binary builds are:
>> >
>> >1. a great service for the users
>> >2. 
should be 
>> hosted on linked sites from people who have this build 
environment, 
>> know the packaging how-to of their distribution and so 
on.
>> >3. could be 
>> used to offer the bleeding edge of development 
to all users (hence an 
>> addendum to the packages hopefully provided 
by the distributions as 
>> such)
>> >
>> >So, packages like those you 
built will always be complementary 
>> to a package offered by the 
distribution as such.
>> >
>> >
>> >----- original 
>> Nachricht 
--------
>> >
>> >Betreff: Re: [Scid-users] precompiled binaries
>> 
>Gesendet: Mi, 02. Jul 2008
>> >Von: Mikhail Kalenkov
>> >
>> >
>> >The 
other way 
>> would be an easy way to
>> >build the Fedora RPM from the 
scid source. Do 
>> you see a way
>> >to get this? Something like 
configure --fedora or the 
>> like
>> >that results in an RPM in the 
end? (Willem: --debian would
>> >be 
>> another target.)
>> >The most 
straight and easiest way to build Fedora 
>> binary RPM is grabbing 
source RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-
>> 3.6.24-8.fc9.src.
rpm in my case) and run command
>> >$rpmbuild --rebuild 
>> scid-3.6.24-
8.fc9.src.rpm
>> >source RPM file is archive with scid sources 
>> 
(scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, 
>> 
spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and installation script. I 
>> guess that source RPM file just realize your idea with --fedora 
>> 
configure option in slightly different way.
>> >  
>> >
>> > But we 
should
>> >discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back.
>> 
>ok. 
>> >
>> >Mikhail Kalenkov.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--- original 
Nachricht Ende ----
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Scid-users mailing 
>> list
>> >[email protected]
>> 
>https://lists.sourceforge.
>> net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >      
>> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>> 
>Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>> >along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic 
lameness
>> >and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.
>> 
net/community/cca08_______________________________________________
>> 
>Scid-users mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> 
>https:
>> //lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>> 
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic 
lameness
>> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.
net/community/cca08
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scid-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https:
//lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>> 
>
>--- original 
Nachricht Ende ----
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to