Hello! In case you could also send me your sources for upload into cvs. I do not want to interfere in your and Pascals work, I just do not know when he will return.
----- original Nachricht -------- Betreff: [Scid-users] R: Re: Scid-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3 Gesendet: Fr, 04. Jul 2008 Von: Giorgio Bellegotti<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hello Roy, > I've already fixed this issue. > I'm waiting that Pascal is > back to give him the new sources, but you can be sure that the history > mode in analysis window will be restored. > > Bye. > Giorgio. > > >---- > Messaggio originale---- > >Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Data: 4-lug-2008 > 9.00 > >A: <[email protected]> > >Ogg: Re: [Scid-users] Scid- > users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3 > > > >I would like to request that an option > be created that will allow the Engine output window to function like > the Chessbase GUI analysis window (i.e. scroll the results of the > analysis as each ply is searched; the time to reach a given ply and the > PV for that ply is not overwritten by the next ply's PV but rather the > previous ply PV is preserved in a scrolling window). If this is not > possible, I will cease to use SCID as it is useless for me without this > (previously the default!) behavior. Every chess GUI I have ever seen > has this option (except not anymore for SCID). > > > >Thanks, > > > >Roy > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ---- > >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] > sourceforge.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: scid- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 2:01:55 PM > >Subject: Scid-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3 > > > >Send Scid-users mailing > list submissions to > > [email protected] > > > >To > subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > https: > //lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users > >or, via email, send > a message with subject or body 'help' to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > sourceforge.net > > > >You can reach the person managing the list at > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >When replying, please edit > your Subject line so it is more specific > >than "Re: Contents of Scid- > users digest..." > >Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Re: precompiled binaries > (Mikhail Kalenkov) > > 2. Re: precompiled binaries (Alexander Wagner) > > 3. Re: DGTDRV in Debian distro? (W. van den Akker) > > 4. Re: > precompiled binaries (W. van den Akker) > > 5. Re: DGTDRV in Debian > distro? (W. van den Akker) > > 6. Xfcc & The Big Competitor(tm) > (Alexander Wagner) > > 7. Debian packages for scid 3.6.24 (Oliver > Korff) > > > > > > > >-----Inline Message Follows----- > > > >build the Fedora RPM > from the scid source. Do you see a way > >to get this? Something like > configure --fedora or the like > >that results in an RPM in the end? > (Willem: --debian would > >be another target.) > >The most straight and > easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM is grabbing source RPM (http: > //katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run > command > >$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm > >source RPM file > is archive with scid sources (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, > ratings_2008_4.zip, spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and > installation script. I guess that source RPM file just realize your > idea with --fedora configure option in slightly different way. > > > > > > > But we should > >discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back. > >ok. > > > >Mikhail Kalenkov. > > > > > > > > > >-----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > >Hi! > > > > > >Alexander Wagner wrote: > > > > > > > >Is it reasonable to put > precompiled binaries for popular > >distributions on the sf project page? > > > > > >IMHO the best way would be for scid to make it into the > >Fedora > distribution. > >I will think on this subject. > > > >The other way would > be an easy way to > >build the Fedora RPM from the scid source. Do you > see a way > >to get this? Something like configure --fedora or the like > >that results in an RPM in the end? (Willem: --debian would > >be another > target.) > >The most straight and easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM > is grabbing source RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8. > fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run command > >$rpmbuild --rebuild scid- > 3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm > >source RPM file is archive with scid sources > (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, > spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and installation script. I > guess that source RPM file just realize your idea with --fedora > configure option in slightly different way. > > > > > > But we should > >discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back. > >ok. > > > >Mikhail Kalenkov. > > > > > > > > > >-----Inline Message Follows----- > > > >build > the Fedora RPM from the scid source. Do you see a way > >to get this? > Something like configure --fedora or the like > >that results in an RPM > in the end? (Willem: --debian would > >be another target.) > >The most > straight and easiest way to build Fedora binary RPM is grabbing source > RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my > case) and run command > >$rpmbuild --rebuild scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm > >source RPM file is archive with scid sources (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, > photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple > patches and installation script. I guess that source RPM file just > realize your idea with --fedora configure option in slightly different > way. > > > > > > But we should > >discuss this here and also with Pascal once > he's back. > >ok. > > > >Mikhail Kalenkov. > > > > > > > >--- original Nachricht > Ende ---- > >MessageHello Mikhail! > > > >I see your point with the src-rpm. > However, I think a binary rpm distribution has another target user. > Mainly, binary rpms, debs and whatever address users that do not want > to build the software but just use it. Especially in the scid community > I'd guess that there're more chess fans than computer geeks. Therefore, > I'd say that a src-rpm should be availble but does not address this > group. > > > >With my --fedora configure option I tought more in the > direction on "how to go to this src-rpm, and then build it". > > > >In > other words, I think it would be nice if the default scid source offers > a way to build a package for specific distributions. This does _not_ > make a binary distribution obsolete but is more thought in the > direction to ease up the src-rpm, src-deb, src-tgz and whatever > packages. > > > >Additionally, building a binary package always requires > the proper build environment. In your case Fedora 9. Or put the other > way round: I could generate a binary package for Debian 4 but non for > Fedora 9. I'd not even be able to build a binary package for Debian > unstable myself. And this is the reason why I'd say that contributed > binary builds are: > > > >1. a great service for the users > >2. should be > hosted on linked sites from people who have this build environment, > know the packaging how-to of their distribution and so on. > >3. could be > used to offer the bleeding edge of development to all users (hence an > addendum to the packages hopefully provided by the distributions as > such) > > > >So, packages like those you built will always be complementary > to a package offered by the distribution as such. > > > > > >----- original > Nachricht -------- > > > >Betreff: Re: [Scid-users] precompiled binaries > >Gesendet: Mi, 02. Jul 2008 > >Von: Mikhail Kalenkov > > > > > >The other way > would be an easy way to > >build the Fedora RPM from the scid source. Do > you see a way > >to get this? Something like configure --fedora or the > like > >that results in an RPM in the end? (Willem: --debian would > >be > another target.) > >The most straight and easiest way to build Fedora > binary RPM is grabbing source RPM (http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/scid- > 3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm in my case) and run command > >$rpmbuild --rebuild > scid-3.6.24-8.fc9.src.rpm > >source RPM file is archive with scid sources > (scid-3.6.24.tar.bz2, photos2007.zip, ratings_2008_4.zip, > spelling_2008_4.zip), some simple patches and installation script. I > guess that source RPM file just realize your idea with --fedora > configure option in slightly different way. > > > > > > But we should > >discuss this here and also with Pascal once he's back. > >ok. > > > >Mikhail Kalenkov. > > > > > > > >--- original Nachricht Ende ---- > >_______________________________________________ > >Scid-users mailing > list > >[email protected] > >https://lists.sourceforge. > net/lists/listinfo/scid-users > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > >Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > >along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > >and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge. > net/community/cca08_______________________________________________ > >Scid-users mailing list > >[email protected] > >https: > //lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > _______________________________________________ > Scid-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users > --- original Nachricht Ende ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
