Thank you for this excellent project.
The first thing I always use to judge the quality of a project is the state of its source code. In perusing the project source tree, I noticed that you apparently decided not to use the source from the originators of CQL, even though it is available on request. Was this a licensing issue, or was it an issue with the quality of their code? Your decision to go with CQL for all search funtionality in Scidb is a huge plus for the project, in my humble opinion, along with your decision to avoid the bloat (e.g., fics, correspondence chess, computer tourny, etc etc etc) that has infected the other Scid derivatives. (No offense intended to Steve and Fulvio.) I'm also curious as to whether there is an scidb-dev list to be found in some obscure corner of the universe? TIA -- Lionel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ Scidb-users mailing list Scidb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scidb-users
