On 03/12/2017 06:09 AM, Gregor Cramer wrote:
> Many thanks for your attention. For me it's a unintelligible why the author of > CQL 5.1 has ignored the whole work, although the new version 5.1 is indeed a > big improvement compared to last version 3.02, except the new syntax. (A new > syntax was required for the improvements, but IMO it is done too lax). Well, I suppose you might be establishing the de facto standard, at least for the db domain. CQL in its present form has a niche audience/user-base. Integrating the concept into a high quality project such as Scidb is, I believe, a game changer. I understand that ChessAssistant has already made the attempt, and I'm not sure how successful it has been, but I do know that the open source world tends to be far more creative than the closed source world. Time will tell, and the CQL-S language will certainly evolve over the long haul, but I for one appreciate what I know is an enormous effort on your part to bring this functionality to a more broad-based free world. Obviously, thanks to Costeff and Stiller for laying the foundation. >> I will create a private branch off the main svn trunk to implement... > > Please take into account that with next big release I will switchover from > Subversion to Bazaar (already announced in a prior post). > Yes, thanks for the reminder. It's not a problem. Bazaar supports rebasing. -- Lionel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ Scidb-users mailing list Scidb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scidb-users
