Am Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:00:28 +0100
schrieb Gregor Cramer <rema...@gmx.net>:

> > >> CQL is a nice play of words on the well known  SQL (Structured
> > >> Query Language) and i like keeping it. But maybe renaming it
> > >> will help differentiate Gregor's implementation from the
> > >> original ?  
> > > 
> > > The point is that Scidb's design will be quite different from
> > > current CQL 5.0, so I think that a different name like ChessQuery
> > > is required. It's a bit  unluckily that the term CQL is already
> > > taken. And the term eCQL - used in my current documentation of
> > > ChessQuery - is not very satisfactory for me.  
> > 
> > I like "SCQL'.... Scidb CQL.  
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion, I agree that SCQL sounds good, but I'm
> not sure that I want a name which contains the project name Scidb,
> because the design of eCQL (ChessQuery) is independent from Scidb's
> internals. Anyone else who has suggestions/proposals for the naming
> of the query language?
> 

CQL++  ;-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Scidb-users mailing list
Scidb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scidb-users

Reply via email to