On 11/01/2017 04:00 AM, Gregor Cramer wrote:
BTW: Also CQL v5.1 is a subset of eCQL (ChessQuery).
If eCQL will be a functional superset of CQL, how much work would be involved in placing a CQL compatibility layer on top of eCQl to translate the syntax?
I'm anticipating that some users will have a rather large library of CQL syntax which they will not care to translate by hand.
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that *you* implement that layer. I'm wondering how much of a gap there will be between the two syntaxes. I believe that you mentioned earlier that the current documentation is not representative of the final syntax.
-- Lionel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Scidb-users mailing list Scidb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scidb-users
