Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 02:37:34PM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote:
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/java/
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/
jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.i586.rpm
jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.10-3.sl5.jpp.i586.rpm
java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.10-3.sl5.jpp.x86_64.rpm
java-1.5.0-sun-compat-1.5.0.90-2.sl.jpp.noarch.rpm
Troy, can you clarify - these rpms will have proper gpg signatures?
No,
The jdk rpm's will not have the proper gpg signatures.
We have not had a 100% success with the signing using an older version of rpm.
That is one of the reason's why I'm so anxious to get openjdk into the
distribution.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________
