On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Troy Dawson wrote:
The jdk's are now signed by me. I have tested them on both SL4 and SL5 32
bit and 64 bit, and they are installing correctly. It looks like the
signature didn't break them this time. Please let me know if anyone has any
problems with these signed jdk's.
jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.i586.rpm is fine,
but my system doesn't like jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
# rm jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm*
# wget --no-cache
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
--05:51:40--
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
Resolving ftp.scientificlinux.org... 131.225.110.41
Connecting to ftp.scientificlinux.org|131.225.110.41|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 59807994 (57M) [application/x-rpm]
Saving to: `jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm'
100%[=============================================================================================>]
59,807,994 13.5M/s in 7.8s
05:51:52 (7.31 MB/s) - `jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm' saved [59807994/59807994]
# md5sum jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
038e61347d86ee0398551fdf1b276ce8 jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
# sha1sum jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
b3ea83bfd3a52dd7b6ab76614dfdf7b98c04f237 jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
# rpm -K jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm: (SHA1) DSA md5 gpg NOT OK
# rpmquery rpm
rpm-4.4.2-48.el5.x86_64
# host ftp.scientificlinux.org
ftp.scientificlinux.org is an alias for linux21.fnal.gov.linux21.fnal.gov has
address 131.225.110.41
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna
