I think perhaps he did not believe in the ability of the revamped franchise 
with new people to succeed on film as well as TV.  Back when he did Star Trek, 
you could not really do TV and movies at the same time.  

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:34 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] William Shatner set to be beamed up

 






Agreed, I said the same on a couple of other e-mails: that Shatner should never 
have agreed to Kirk's death, and that the Nexus is a ridiculously easy way to 
bring him back. 


----- Original Message -----
From: wlro...@aol.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 1:17:36 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] William Shatner set to be beamed up

  

I understand when we think Star Trek we think Enterprise. I think that too but 
Shatner should have thought about that before he allowed his character to die 
on Veridian 3. Perhaps if they are going to bring him back it should be from 
the Nexus and have him at least attempt to fix the messed up time line. 

--Lavender

 

From: Keith Johnson <mailto:keithbjohn...@comcast.net>  

Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:20 PM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] William Shatner set to be beamed up

 

I'll be succinct.

 

One. It was a mistake not to include Shatner in a Trek movie. Unlike many who 
either don't like him, or see him as not essential to Treklore, I like Shatner 
fine. Star Trek was more about Shatner, I'd argue, in terms of the human quest 
for knowledge and enlightenment, than Spock, despite Spock's popularity. 
Really, they need each other, so to have one without the other? Bad move.

 

Two. I wonder how they'll bring in Shatner in this new timeline? Makes me 
frustrated again at the whole alternate reality angle, which I fear I shall 
never fully embrace.


----- Original Message -----
From: "brent wodehouse" <brent_wodeho...@thefence.us>
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:09:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [scifinoir2] William Shatner set to be beamed up

  

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/film/2986590/William-Shatner-set-to-be-beamed-up

William Shatner set to be beamed up

Last updated 13:32 21/10/2009

Hollywood director JJ Abrams appears set to beam William Shatner up to the
Star Trek sequel.

Abrams suffered plenty of criticism from Star Trek fans when he opted not
to cast Shatner, the original Captain James T Kirk of the USS Enterprise,
in this year's big screen update of the iconic sci-fi film and TV series.

Abrams did cast the original Spock, Leonard Nimoy.

Star Trek was one of the most successful films of 2009, earning almost
US$400 million (NZ$542.81m) at the worldwide box office, and with a sequel
set for release in theatres in 2011, Abrams confirmed Shatner may be
offered a role.

"I would love to work with him," Abrams told reporters in Los Angeles at a
press conference to promote the release of the Star Trek DVD.

"We speak. We actually have a lunch date planned."

Abrams opted to make Star Trek a prequel, winding the clock back to the
early years of the Star Trek crew with young actors Chris Pine (Kirk),
Zachary Quinto (Spock) and Simon Pegg (Montgomery Scott) filling the lead
roles.

While Abrams and screenwriters Bob Orci and Alex Kurtzman managed to find
a way to bring Nimoy back, they opted against offering Shatner a role.

The dilemma they faced is examined in The Shatner Conundrum, one of the
extra features on the Star Trek DVD.

"It was a foregone conclusion we wanted him in the movie," Abrams
explained.

"The problem was his character died on screen in one of his Trek films and
because we decided, very early on, that we wanted to adhere to Trek canon
as best we could ... the required machinations to get Shatner into the
movie would have been very difficult to do given the story we wanted to
tell and also to give him the kind of part that he would be happy with.

"It was this thing where it would have felt like a gimmick in order to get
Shatner in the movie, which would have honestly, to me, been distracting."

The success of Abrams' Star Trek and the welcome Pine, Quinto, Pegg and
other new actors received from Trekkies will make it easier to introduce
Shatner into the sequel, Abrams said.

"In terms of moving forward, I am open to anything," Abrams added.

"I feel like the first movie did some of the heavy lifting that needed to
be done in order to free us to continue going forward. Maybe there's less
of a burden and there's going to be more opportunity to work with him
(Shatner)."

The Star Trek DVD, set for release in Australia on October 29, is filled
with extras, including gag reels, three hours of bonus footage,
commentary, secrets behind th e costumes and sets and deleted scenes that
reveal a side story involving Eric Bana's villainous character Nero.

The DVD also includes what is billed as "ground-breaking augmented reality
technology" which, through a webcam, allows a 3D holographic tour of the
Enterprise.

Abrams said the decision to hold the world premiere for Star Trek at the
Sydney Opera House in April was the perfect launch pad for the movie.

"I have been to Sydney before and I loved it the first time," Abrams told
AAP in a video interview.

"This last time it was so surreal. First of all I had never been to the
Opera House which could not have been more beautiful.

"The reception was off the charts. The people were so kind. It was
beautiful, maybe not atypical Sydney weather, but I called my wife and
said 'We might have to move here'.

"I am serious. I want to go back not just for professional reasons. I just
want to go back because it is f antastic."








Reply via email to