On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, at 17:25, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> Stéfan, btw, one last Q: what do you think about my suggestions for the 
> (u)int32 and (u)int64 image types? I feel like assuming a range up to 
> 2**32 when converting is *never* useful.

Agreed, I don't think anyone ever uses uint32 for images.  Typically 16, but 
perhaps also 64?

scikit-image mailing list

Reply via email to