On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi James. > Thanks for the PR. > I thinks so far we avoided changing LibSVM and tried to get patches > in upstream. Afaik, this hasn't succeeded so far. > The cases I am thinking of is me trying to get the chi2 kernel in and > Lars cleaning up some of the code. > > As LibSVM seems to be very conservative wrt. features and patches, > I think we should reconsider our policy and accept your modifications.
I would still suggest trying to get it upstream in case it work this time :) > > Can you give some insights into why this check is necessary and in > what kind of situations LibSVM fails to converge? I guess it uses > the duality gap for convergence. Is is the case that this is not > a good measure sometimes? > > Cheers, > Andy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > How fast is your code? > 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. > Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? > http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html > _______________________________________________ > Scikit-learn-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
