2013/1/10 Andreas Mueller <[email protected]>: > I wanted to ask: should we try to make plans? We get a lot of PRs and > have more and more contributors and I think it might be nice > if we had some form of road map to give everything a bit more direction. > > I know that people mostly contribute algorithms they are using in research, > and that is great, because that makes for high-quality code. > I am not sure, though, for how long the "hey look, I coded this cool > estimator which I used in my latest paper" strategy is feasible.
What we could do is determine a focus for the next release other than "add more features", like: * implement Python 3 support * fix outstanding API issues, like sparse matrix support for some estimators. That would be a step towards a 1.0. -- Lars Buitinck Scientific programmer, ILPS University of Amsterdam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
