2013/1/11 Vlad Niculae <zephy...@gmail.com>: > I completely agree with everyone regarding 1.0 and I really think we should > make a clear list of issues for this (just saying API is pretty vague). > However there is life after the 1.0, and I think Andy's message was more > about that kind of long-term decisions.
Agreed. > We should avoid getting features that aren't used by users, and equally well > features that aren't of interest to active developers. I don't feel like > scikit-learn is at risk at the moment, but we must avoid ending up with > (more?) semi-orphaned modules that most developers are afraid to touch in > case an issue is reported. Very true. -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
