On 07/12/2013 09:23 AM, Vlad Niculae wrote: > The requirements are definitely the blocking thing here. Not just the > dependency on cvxopt but also the inference packages and the fact they > need to be built manually. The api is sklearn-ish enough even with > lists-of-lists. > The API, yes, but the input format not. Just tossing around ndarrays is one of the big strengths of sklearn, I think.
Also, It just would increase the scope of sklearn sooo much! I'm not sure that is a good thing. But that is not for me to decide ;) I think we should first see how the pystruct thing goes, and worry about the rest later. Cheers, Andy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
