On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote: > > Structured prediction in sklearn was one of the outcomes from the survey. > > Would it be a better idea to send people to pystruct, rather than > > implement it here?
> I think so. I think so to. > We decided that structured prediction was out of scope for sklearn, > right? For now quite clearly. Sklearn is already quite broad, I think. > Of course you can try to convince me otherwise once pystruct is more > mature, but I think the difference in target group and input format is > quite big. Also, the project has a ton of requirements - we are working > to make this more manageable but having cvxopt as a hard requirement is > probably necessary. Indeed. I think that in the long, maybe, possibly, if we find the right abstraction, (...), we might have a bit of structured prediction in sklearn, but that's years down the line. Go go pystruct! G ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
