On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andreas Mueller
<amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de>wrote:
>
> About naming it scikit-struct: is there any requirement to become a scikit?
> Also: is there much benefit - pandas seems to be doing quite well
> without the brand ;)
>
My suggestion was half a joke :). But I find it a little bit disappointing
that scikit-learn and scikit-image are the only great scikits. Having a
more diverse ecosystem of great scikits would be beneficial for the Python
scientific community, in terms of branding.
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
