On 07/28/2016 12:03 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel.
This hasn't been brought up before so there is no "official position".
I am generally in favor, though I'm not sure how doable it is.
We are generally pretty generous in accepting all kinds of inputs, and many
of our options can have different types: (None, int, float, string,
nd-array) is relatively common as a type for an option.
As we still support 2.6, we would need to do comments or external files.
Given numpy has dropped support for 2.6, maybe it would be reasonable
for scikit-learn to do the same, to make this process easier?
How would it change the process?
We have been discussing this. My stance is that we should drop it
as soon as it creates a major nuisance, but not just for the sake
of dropping it.
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
