Hi, On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel. > This hasn't been brought up before so there is no "official position". > I am generally in favor, though I'm not sure how doable it is. > We are generally pretty generous in accepting all kinds of inputs, and many > of our options can have different types: (None, int, float, string, > nd-array) is relatively common as a type for an option. > As we still support 2.6, we would need to do comments or external files.
Given numpy has dropped support for 2.6, maybe it would be reasonable for scikit-learn to do the same, to make this process easier? Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
