On 17 September 2016 at 01:21, Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org > wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:14:12AM +1000, Joel Nothman wrote: > > One downside is that there does not yet seem to be a way to search for > > PRs with a specified level of approval (while searching for "MRG+1" > sort-of > > works). > > Yes, I do that a lot. So this is not a great improvement for me. > A lot of the new features, including this, do not seem to have Github APIs (or at least documentation) yet. When we adopted title hacking, PRs could not receive labels. *Would labels be an improvement over title hacking for recording approval status?* I think it would be worth trying to have a rough *priority ranking for things we'd like to see in 0.19*. However the Github Milestones feature is a bit crippled in UI: you can rank issues, but cannot filter by anything but open/closed, so for instance cannot see bugs and non-bugs separately. Perhaps Projects come to supersede that, although I think they work best for small-scale sprints rather than release-level milestones. And you cannot search sorted by milestone priority. Apart from an interface for manual prioritising, I think we would benefit from *automatic labelling*: * of issues to say when a PR mentioning the issue exists * of PRs to say whether there's been 1 or 2 LGTMs by core devs There are a number of issue labelling bots around -- https://github.com/ botdylan/botdylan seems to be one of the more configurable -- but hosted solutions don't seem readily available. Does anyone know of strong preferences for tracking + labelling bot solutions? waffle.io seems to go in this direction but is relatively inflexible.
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
