Hello, Mistake, I meant the Mozilla license not the Perl license. I want to:
-require derivative of it's source code base be made public - I may be more strict on this one, there seem to be some companies which are supposed to have somethings public but find good ways to hide them. -retain copyright of each and every document, and source file -have the ability to change the license -allow mixing open/closed source http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/gpl.pdf is quite a good paper on open source licensing from a legal view. The Mozilla license seems to give me all I want and also the community. Again, I want a community agreement before I proceed to re-license, thus the reason for the first license. I believe Mozilla suits most of the needs - what do you think ? Dave *************************************************************** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***************************************************************
