Hi, > I don't think the triple license MPL/GPL/LGPL is usefull in our case > since I don't know if Musclecard will be included in LGPL only libraries > [4]: > "Why didn't you use an MPL/GPL dual license, as originally announced? > > Because an MPL/GPL dual license would not allow developers to use > Mozilla code in a library distributed under the LGPL. [...]" > > Comments on this proposal?
I personally like and support Ludovic's proposal (dual license: MPL/GPL). Anybody out there see possible problems with this? Carlos. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com *************************************************************** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***************************************************************
