> Via the command line. fine, just 2 make sure that we don't get license troubles.
LieGrue, strub --- Ivan Luzyanin <ivanob...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di, 13.1.2009: > Von: Ivan Luzyanin <ivanob...@gmail.com> > Betreff: Re: accurev provider > An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org > Datum: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009, 12:04 > Via the command line. > > > struberg wrote: > > > > slightly OT: the JDK1.5 question also applies to the > native Java > > implementation of maven-scm-providers-git. > > > > This is now even more interesting as Shawn changed the > license of egit > > from LGPL to BSD a while ago. This means we have no > license problems > > anymore. > > > > Grant, I've not yet looked at the accurev code, > but how does it invoke the > > SCM? Via API or via command line? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > --- ggardner <gdgard...@optusnet.com.au> schrieb > am Di, 13.1.2009: > > > >> Von: ggardner <gdgard...@optusnet.com.au> > >> Betreff: Re: accurev provider > >> An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org > >> Datum: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009, 11:14 > >> Thanks, I wanted an excuse to try out a coverage > tool. 6 > >> more lines in the > >> pom and Cobertura tells me 90% coverage. > >> > >> Though one immediate question is whether it is > acceptable > >> for one provider > >> to require JDK 1.5. If not I'll have to remove > JDK 1.5 > >> dependancies > >> (generics, JMock, JUnit4) that were useful for > putting it > >> all together in a > >> TDD fashion. > >> > >> Grant. > >> > >> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:21:15 -0800, Jason van Zyl > >> <jvan...@sonatype.com> > >> wrote: > >> > If you got code then you need to accompany it > with > >> complete tests or > >> > we're likely not to look at it. > >> > > >> > On 12-Jan-09, at 4:51 AM, ggardner wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> I've been working on extending the > AccuRev > >> provider implementation > >> >> to be > >> >> fully compatible with the maven release > plugin. > >> >> (ie update, status, checkin, tag, > checkout, add) > >> >> > >> >> I think I'm pretty close with the > necessary > >> commands implemented and > >> >> the > >> >> tck tests passing against an AccuRev > evaluation > >> install. > >> >> > >> >> Assuming someone here is interested > I'll have > >> a bunch of questions > >> >> about > >> >> how I might go about contributing this > code. > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Grant. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Jason > >> > > >> > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> > Jason van Zyl > >> > Founder, Apache Maven > >> > jason at sonatype dot com > >> > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > >> > What matters is not ideas, but the people who > have > >> them. Good people > >> > can fix bad ideas, but good ideas can't > save bad > >> people. > >> > > >> > -- Paul Graham > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/accurev-provider-tp21413963p21433339.html > Sent from the Maven - SCM mailing list archive at > Nabble.com.
