Thanks Mark. I will do that.

---
Todd Thiessen
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] 
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:37 AM
> To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SCM plugin project
> 
> Open a Jira, ship the patch, and I bet you'll get response.
> 
> LieGrü,
> strub
> 
> 
> --- Todd Thiessen <thies...@nortel.com> schrieb am Mo, 19.1.2009:
> 
> > Von: Todd Thiessen <thies...@nortel.com>
> > Betreff: RE: SCM plugin project
> > An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
> > Datum: Montag, 19. Januar 2009, 15:16
> > Are there any further comments regarding this? Do we need 
> to open the 
> > discussion to a wider audience to get some traction on it?
> > 
> > ---
> > Todd Thiessen
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thiessen, Todd (BVW:9T16)
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:49 AM
> > > To: 'scm-dev@maven.apache.org'
> > > Subject: RE: SCM plugin project
> > > 
> > > Yes it occurs in a standard SVN installation. This is
> > done by
> > > using svn hooks which is precisely what we have. 
> > Anyone can
> > > change the output of the svn log command (ie: no
> > change to
> > > svn source is required).  So yes I definiately
> > consider this
> > > standard.  It isn't considered "default"
> > behaviour, but I
> > > would definitely describe it as standard.
> > > 
> > > It is my opinion that this fix should be in the main
> > repo. 
> > > Individual users/companies should not have to maintain
> > their
> > > own copy of it. It makes synchronizing changes between
> > the
> > > main repo and all others an extra chore that
> > shouldn't be necessary.
> > > 
> > > We should also take note that Subversion does not make
> > any
> > > guarantees regarding the format of the svn log author
> > output. 
> > > They could very well change this "default"
> > behaviour to
> > > something that doesn't match what is currently
> > being parsed. 
> > > So the fix I am proposing makes the code base more
> > robust,
> > > which is always a good thing.
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > Todd Thiessen
> > >  
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:30 AM
> > > > To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: SCM plugin project
> > > > 
> > > > Humm, so this SVN behaviour cannot occur in a
> > standard SVN
> > > > installation? Or can this also be achieved by
> > anyone? If
> > > not, there is
> > > > imho little chance of getting your changes into
> > the upstream repo.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you have a parent pom for your projects? Have
> > you tried
> > > to override
> > > > the dependency on maven-scm-provider-svnexe for
> > your build to a
> > > > locally patched version via
> > <dependencyManagement> ?
> > > > 
> > > > I assume you have something like archiva,
> > mavenproxy or nexus setup
> > > > and also have a company-internal plugin
> > repository, isn't?
> > > > 
> > > > So you could easily make the release process work
> > for your company
> > > > without having to release your changes to the
> > public repo.
> > > > 
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- Todd Thiessen <thies...@nortel.com>
> > schrieb am Do, 15.1.2009:
> > > > 
> > > > > Von: Todd Thiessen
> > <thies...@nortel.com>
> > > > > Betreff: RE: SCM plugin project
> > > > > An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
> > > > > Datum: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2009, 15:33
> > > > >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/scm-dev@maven.apache.org/msg01173.html
> > > > > 
> > > > > It seems I wasn't actually subscribed to
> > scm-dev so I
> > > > didn't' get this
> > > > > response right away. Thanks for the response
> > Mark.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have actually tested this and have seen it
> > fail. We have made
> > > > > modifications to SVN to print out the author
> > differently.
> > > > > I noticed the
> > > > > problem when I tried running the changelog
> > report and got
> > > > no output.  
> > > > > I was bashing my head on my desk trying to
> > figure out why for the
> > > > > longest time ;-).
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have also already made the modifications
> > to the
> > > > > maven-scm-provider-svnexe project and added
> > all appropriate test
> > > > > cases.
> > > > > My initial plan was to simply store a copy
> > of the source
> > > in our svn
> > > > > repo. However, I now have permission to
> > submit this to the proper
> > > > > place.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I will raise a JIRA to track the issue and
> > then I would
> > > > like to submit
> > > > > a patch for all appropriate personnel to
> > review.  Do I
> > > > simply attach
> > > > > an SVN patch to this mailing list?
> > > > > 
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Todd Thiessen
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >       
> > > > 
> > >
> 
> 
>       
> 

Reply via email to