Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes:

> It does -appear- that the CSV is now eliding closed cases.  This was
> never previously the case, and when we discussed this interface with (at
> the time) John Plocher, were told this was by intent, and it was
> reasonable to rely on.

Actually, scratch that.  The pieces missing have no discernable pattern.

  PSARC 2009/171 (Chris's case) is missing from the CSV, yet open
  (according to arc.o.o).

  PSARC 2009/277 is closed, but *is* in the CSV.

For reference, the CSV I'm assuming to be current is:
   http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/caseinfo.csv.txt

-- Rich

Reply via email to