Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: > It does -appear- that the CSV is now eliding closed cases. This was > never previously the case, and when we discussed this interface with (at > the time) John Plocher, were told this was by intent, and it was > reasonable to rely on.
Actually, scratch that. The pieces missing have no discernable pattern. PSARC 2009/171 (Chris's case) is missing from the CSV, yet open (according to arc.o.o). PSARC 2009/277 is closed, but *is* in the CSV. For reference, the CSV I'm assuming to be current is: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/caseinfo.csv.txt -- Rich