James Carlson wrote: > Richard Lowe writes: >> Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: >> >>> It does -appear- that the CSV is now eliding closed cases. This was >>> never previously the case, and when we discussed this interface with (at >>> the time) John Plocher, were told this was by intent, and it was >>> reasonable to rely on. >> Actually, scratch that. The pieces missing have no discernable pattern. > > Correct. I think the database itself is corrupt and/or that the > scripts have run off the rails. > > It's spewing messages that appear to have been gathered from a recent > case renaming, but it's unclear to me whether that actually has > anything to do with the problem or is just a coincidence. > > In any event, it's very broken.
Is it possible we could have comchk work similar to webrev does now - in fact using the same its config files recently introduced. So that when it is run inside SWAN it uses sac.sfbay instead of arc.opensolaris.org ? -- Darren J Moffat
