Richard Lowe wrote: > > To the best of my knowledge, anonymous write is never a possibility, > and I can't immediately even begin to come up with a reason why you'd > want it. > > Given that the anonymous user has a read-only view *anyway*, are you > actually asking for the (extra) to allow anonymous write? > > -- Rich >
No, if that is the case, then all I'm asking is that it is made clear that the view is read-only on the page. BTW - I think I populated nfsv41/nfs41-gate over anonymous ssh.