Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 02:58:40AM +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> 
>> Martin Walsh wrote:
>>> http://repo.opensolaris.org
>>>
>>> The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
>>> functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting
>>> the UI correct, before adding more features to the console.
>>>
>>> Bug reports, feedback, etc welcome.
> 
> Perhaps a Cancel button on the Edit Repository screen?

OK.

> 
> Affiliates could have a complete list, too -- are there enough projects
> which have enough affiliates to require not printing the list?  I searched
> for "sch", but it didn't return anything, perahps because he's a project
> leader.  Are there any affiliates I could search for?
> 
> Is there a list of committers?  Any way to turn affiliates into committers?

If you just click search with no search criteria, all the affiliates 
will be shown.  This will allow you to check the search functionality, 
and see how to give commit rights.

> 
> Will there be any way to disassociate Project Leaders from committers?
> That's one of the things that annoys me currently.

Could you elaborate further on this.  Not quite sure I understand what 
you mean.

> 
> In the Action column, why have a view icon, when the more obvious thing to
> do is to click on the repo name?  For that matter, I'd think that clicking
> on the repo name and then on edit is more intuitive than hovering over the
> icons in the Action column to figure out what they mean, and then clicking
> on the one that told me it was Edit.

These are just quick links.  Especially the view icon.  It will bring 
the repository details up in a pop up, so you still have your repository 
list available.

> 
> What does Verify actually do?

Verifies the integrity of the repository (svnadmin verify $REPO_PATH.) 
This is only supported by Subversion.

> 
> Will there be a link from the Project Leader

To where?  There profile?

> 
> On the Edit Repository screen, "Notification" is misspelled.
> 
Whoops, thanks.

Martin


Reply via email to