On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 03:08:38PM -0500, Richard Lowe wrote: > We *can* just pick a uniquifying prefix now, but we lose the > muscle-memory compat with wx, which is something people were eager to > retain.
They're not going to use wx with mercurial--that's already enforced in wx. So that means they'll be learning new stuff anyway (hg itself). What if those long-time wx people typed "hg -h" and, in that output, they saw a group of commands with a "wx" or "wx_" prefix? I think they'd know exactly what they were looking at. hg wxlist hg wxnits hg wxpdiffs hg wxrtichk For those who have serious problems with this, a new 'wx' could be: ---cut--- #!/bin/sh cmd=$1 shift hg wx$cmd "$@" ---cut--- Dean
