Mike Kupfer wrote:
>>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes:
> 
> stevel> i'm open to putting a different URL there if people want.
> 
> I'd be happier pointing to a community web page, since I expect that to
> live longer than the project web pages.

Good point, I'll do that.

> Rich> This is only going to work if the user has access to TeamWare (the
> Rich> binaries), but is in the wrong gate.  If they're on a build machine
> Rich> without teamware, it's going to give them the "cannot find workspace
> Rich> command in $PATH" error, as always.  Is that what we want?
> 
> I lean towards including the check for a Mercurial workspace and issuing
> the Mercurial message.  I think that's more helpful for people who
> mostly use wx but have to deal with Mercurial occasionally (e.g., Sun
> support engineers).

I can move it further up, which eliminates the "cannot find workspace 
command in $PATH" error - but also removes the possibility for a 
Teamware repo to exist within a Mercurial repo (which I really don't 
think will/should ever happen anyway... famous last words).

Does that seem reasonable?

http://cr.opensolaris.org/~stevel/292_wx-cdm

cheers,
steve

-- 
stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development

Reply via email to