Stephen Lau <stevel at sun.com> writes: > Mike Kupfer wrote: >>>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: >> >> stevel> i'm open to putting a different URL there if people want. >> >> I'd be happier pointing to a community web page, since I expect that to >> live longer than the project web pages. > > Good point, I'll do that. > >> Rich> This is only going to work if the user has access to TeamWare (the >> Rich> binaries), but is in the wrong gate. If they're on a build machine >> Rich> without teamware, it's going to give them the "cannot find workspace >> Rich> command in $PATH" error, as always. Is that what we want? >> >> I lean towards including the check for a Mercurial workspace and issuing >> the Mercurial message. I think that's more helpful for people who >> mostly use wx but have to deal with Mercurial occasionally (e.g., Sun >> support engineers). > > I can move it further up, which eliminates the "cannot find workspace > command in $PATH" error - but also removes the possibility for a > Teamware repo to exist within a Mercurial repo (which I really don't > think will/should ever happen anyway... famous last words).
It may, in theory, happen. But I certainly have no desire to support such a thing. > Does that seem reasonable? > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~stevel/292_wx-cdm > > cheers, > steve > > -- > stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net > opensolaris // solaris kernel development
