Richard Lowe wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> Could I get review of:
> 
>   #442 ws should stop talking about 5.0, check uname -s
> 
> Webrev:
>   http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richlowe/scm_442
> 
> 
> This deals with two of sommerfeld's code review comments:
> 
>    WES-7   line 371:  I think you mean "SunOS 5.x-specific" since 5.0 is
>            long gone.
>    WES-8   Lines 376-408: I suspect a "uname -s" check is also in
>            order.
> 
> The mentions of "5.0" and things being "5.x specific" are removed, and
> the condition surrounding the warning message reversed (and only
> surrounding the warning), since SunOS 5.x is really the only option.
> 
> However, I left the message as a warning, rather than an error.  I
> would be ok with making it fatal (and checking it sooner), but am not
> certain whether at least attempting to run in other places is
> something people do or may make use of.  Opinion either way would be
> welcomed.

Works for me, though I'd prefer to see a snarkier message
on line 404 :-)


James
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp       http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog

Reply via email to