Notes, SCM Migration Project Meeting
Fri, 4/4/08, 10:30am-11:00am PDT
Attendees:
John Beck
Linda Bernal
Jim Carlson
Bonnie Corwin
Mike Kupfer
Rich Lowe
Bill Rushmore
Miguel Ulloa
* AI updates
AI: Bonnie will craft some email to start a separate
process discussion about how the ON RTI process will work.
NOT DONE. See next agenda item below.
AI: Putting 0.9.5 on os.org servers. Will be done as part of more
general server upgrade plan. IN PROGRESS: Upgrade plan in
progress on Bonnie's team for the machines that use Mercurial.
More detail as plan is finalized.
IN PROGRESS
AI: Dave Marker will try to take a look at the interface.
Everyone else is encouraged to do the same and send input
about issues, requests, etc.
ON HOLD: Dave pulled for an Indiana firedrill for the moment.
AI: Bonnie to ask MikeS if he thinks SCM console user interface
is ok as-is for SFW for now.
DONE: Email sent to Mike
UPDATE: MikeK will talk to Mike and show him the interface
so it can be evaluated for SFW.
AI: Bonnie will set up a meeting with Bill/Meem/Linda re:
documentation to get that started.
Transferred to Michelle Olson: IN PROGRESS
AI: Bonnie will follow up on Stacey Marshall's email requesting
that some internal documentation be moved outside.
Transferred to Michelle Olson: IN PROGRESS
* AI: ON RTI discussion
Bonnie would like to give this to the ON people since it will
involve discussion about ON process and she won't have time to
get to this until some time in May.
In the 3/14 meeting, the topic of an RTI process came up in a
discussion about the rti/rtichk tools. Since the tools are
currently tied to WebRTI, it wasn't clear how far we can go with
rti/rtichk without the new OpenRTI tool. Which then led to
questions about the process and how we will be handling questions
currently on the WebRTI tool that can't be part of an open tool.
OpenRTI has a project page: http://opensolaris.org/project/openrti
MikeK has been trading email with Larry Lam because Larry is
interested in setting up a Mercurial repository.
Conclusion: AI: Jbeck will talk with Valerie and Miguel about
figuring out status and plans for the OpenRTI tool and then
moving to any process planning or other discussions that might
be needed.
* Internal code review
Are we ready to start an internal code review (follow-up from
discussion in 3/21 meeting)?
MikeK still needs to go through the open bugs to rank according
to risk. We also have feedback from Bill Sommerfeld that we
should be sure is incorporated before a final review.
* Recommit code in Cadmium
Technical discussion was held this week. Decision: continue
with the current implementation.
* Test Plan draft
Jim Walker (via email) is targeting Monday, 4/7 to have this
available.
