Bonnie Corwin <Bonnie.Corwin at Sun.COM> writes: > Notes, SCM Migration Project Meeting > Fri, 4/4/08, 10:30am-11:00am PDT >
... > * AI: ON RTI discussion > > Bonnie would like to give this to the ON people since it will > involve discussion about ON process and she won't have time to > get to this until some time in May. Minor point there (which I've missed what, two? three? times now). SFW make use of RTI too, so we may wish to talk to them too, or is it assumed that SFW's needs are a strict subset of ON's? (I think they probably are, but I don't know) > In the 3/14 meeting, the topic of an RTI process came up in a > discussion about the rti/rtichk tools. Since the tools are > currently tied to WebRTI, it wasn't clear how far we can go with > rti/rtichk without the new OpenRTI tool. Which then led to > questions about the process and how we will be handling questions > currently on the WebRTI tool that can't be part of an open tool. > > OpenRTI has a project page: http://opensolaris.org/project/openrti > > MikeK has been trading email with Larry Lam because Larry is > interested in setting up a Mercurial repository. > > Conclusion: AI: Jbeck will talk with Valerie and Miguel about > figuring out status and plans for the OpenRTI tool and then > moving to any process planning or other discussions that might > be needed. There was the bit of conversation Mark, John(?) and I had on that same call regarding whether a gate could move to opensolaris.org (but still with strictly SMI-only putback) without OpenRTI in place. I'm not sure I recall what came of that. -- Rich
