On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 23:59 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > if so, I see the additional caveat: strictly speaking, resolved is the > status, but "unable to reproduce" is another field ( resolution ), so > you may also consider spiltting the "command" in more lines like: > > status 547: resolved > resolution 547: unable to reproduce
Splitting the command could be laborious. There's also a case where the resolution also provides "data" with it. e.g. status 548: resolved duplicate 547 The new status is "resolved" The new resolition is "duplicate" The resolution data are "547". We'd be stretching it if we had an even third line to describe the data when splitting the command. _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
