Correction to my previous email....
I had been running ScmBug 0.19.13 (not 0.25.2) for over a year and
things were perfect.
Gary Brunton
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Gary Brunton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kristis!
>
> Okay, I've switched my ScmBug version to 0.23.4 as you've suggested.
> This appears to be working MUCH better. Thanks!
>
> I've upgraded my initial repository glue with no issues at all.
> Everything went perfect as far as I could tell. The activity.log does
> display the following though:
>
> Wed Apr 30 08:54:10 2008 127.0.0.1:2683 Processing connection from
> Wed Apr 30 08:54:10 2008 127.0.0.1:2683 No username supplied.
> Wed Apr 30 08:54:10 2008 127.0.0.1:2683 Invalid value '' for policy
> presence_of_bug_ids.
> Wed Apr 30 08:54:10 2008 127.0.0.1:2683 Connection from processed
>
> I expect this is okay although I don't know why it complains about the
> no username and an invalid value for the presence_of_bug_ids. My glue
> config file contains the following for this parameter:
>
> presence_of_bug_ids => {
> value => 'required'
> },
>
> But again, for me things seem to be working.
>
> I did not have any more issues with the upgrading process hanging on
> me. I have to be honest here, it may be just the case that when I was
> doing this yesterday I just didn't hit enter enough times. Instead I
> was waiting for something else to happen and because nothing else was,
> I thought it was hanging. Very dumb but very possible. I thought I
> had hit enter enough times yesterday but today I found myself again
> waiting for something to happen (thinking it was hanging) and then I
> realized that the enter prompt came up again. I hit enter again and
> it completed. Stupid users :)
>
> One more thought that I've brought up before (around a year ago). I
> still cannot use the windows zip tool to unzip the downloaded zip
> file. I receive the following error:
>
> "Windows has blocked access to these files to help protect your computer"
>
> I did look into this A LITTLE but did not find anything too
> interesting (as far as a fix). I'm just bringing this up again
> because for window's users that are giving this a try, this might be a
> little discouraging to come across as this is one of the first things
> they have to do. Petty? Sure, but I think the less friction the best.
>
> I have to say I'm very happy once again and will report any problems
> that may come up. Before this upgrade, I had been running on the
> 0.25.2 version for almost a year and not once did I have any issues.
>
> For me, once things are configured (which does cause a little
> friction) this product works perfectly.
>
> Thanks for everyone's hard work!
>
> Gary Brunton
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Kristis Makris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 15:57 -0700, Kristis Makris wrote:
>>
>>> > Issue #2:
>>> > I'm trying to upgrade repository glue running the following command:
>>> >
>>> > It would hang after a couple of iterations of hitting Enter to
>>> > continue and I would have to force it to stop. I know I'm being very
>>>
>>> I don't like the sound of this at all... sounds like a broken protocol.
>>
>> I don't see a bad protocol bug in the current code. This must be a
>> different issue. Perhaps there's an issue related to upgrading that we
>> have not considered.
>>
>
_______________________________________________
scmbug-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
