I cannot make this patch the main if this patch contains changes to sent emails. You can prepare two separate patches, even if you are working directly with the server copy.
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:37 +0100, Uditha Atukorala wrote: > Yes, this one is also a patch for the Bugzilla.pm(.in) in Scmbug 0.26.15, > not for my last patch. > > I work directly with the server copy and it is easier for me to create a > patch for Bugzilla.pm(.in). Sorry about that. > > Kristis, could you please make this patch the main and I will post the > future ones based on this? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 02 July 2009 03:47 > To: Uditha Atukorala > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [scmbug-users] Bugzilla 3.2.3 patch - now working with status > changes > > But this is a different type of patch. It should be separate than the other > patch you have sent. Instead you have clumped everything together. > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:49 +0100, Uditha Atukorala wrote: > > I've added a few more changes to send Bugzilla emails on integration. In > Bugzilla 3.2.3 (not sure about other versions) the sanity check complains > about unsent emails. This patch should solve that issue and the code is a > little bit more readable... > > > > Does anyone have an idea on how to solve daemon stop/restart issue? If > > someone could give me some pointers on where to start I'll try to fix > > that. I'm using a Debian Lenny installation by the way- > > Have you looked at the comments in this bug ? > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=644 > > > > _______________________________________________ > scmbug-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
