Uditha, thanks for all your efforts. I'm sure the patch can be cleaned up and made available :)
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:54 +0100, Uditha Atukorala wrote: > I admit, this is very very bad coding and the patch is only working > for Bugzilla 3.2 but seems to work OK in a production environment. > > "working with status changes" means it now counts "status <bug-id>: RESOLVED > FIXED" > and changes the bug status accordingly which I think I broke in one of the > earlier patches. > In Bugzilla 3.2 you can have custom statuses (which we are using) so I adapt > the coding for > my needs. > > By all means this is only a quick patch to use Bugzilla 3.2 with scmbug and > needs proper changes to > maintain scmbug compatibility. is_latest_version() should return true for > Bugzilla 3.2 so might need > changes to comply with scmbug standards. > > When I was making changes I replaced/changed Bugzilla 3.0 code to support > Bugzilla 3.2 so the patch is > missing Bugzilla 3.0 code. So in a blind guess it should be straight forward > to get back Bugzilla 3.0 > support but needs some patience (I have started the coding but never got to > finish it)... I have > moved on to another project so if I get back to coding perl I'll try to get > back Bugzilla 3.0 supprt :) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > scmbug-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
