> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 18:43 +0100, Uditha Atukorala wrote: > > Another patch. This is now working with status changes as well.
What does "working with status changes" mean ? The patch lacks documentation related to this. For example, it adds support for 3.2, but I believe it breaks the status support for 3.0 in bug_status_map(). It only accounts for is_version_latest(). How about the Bugzilla 3.0 users ? Will we ignore them, just because we want to use 3.2 ? Why do you not use Bugzilla::Bug::is_open_state() and instead use Bugzilla::Status::is_open() ? Is the latter function not available in Bugzilla 3.0 ? Is at available in both ? A patch without documentation, and a commit log message, cannot be applied.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
