Hi Yavor, This is a big mistake on my part. I'm sorry.
I thought that the status resolution work needed was already included in the patches from Elias and Uditha. I was not aware of the fact that bz_lock_tables was causing problems. On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 18:09 +0200, Yavor Nikolov wrote: > Sorry for the wrong subject from initial report of this issue. > > Seems bugzilla 3.2+ removed bz_lock_tables in it's code and is > handling database changes in > bz_start_transaction/bz_commit_transaction blocks. > > I can see some earlier complains for this problem.. but it has been > announced that v0.26.17 is supporting status changes for bugzilla 3.4 > now. Do you recall where ? I can't find it any report related to bz_lock_tables in the issue-tracker.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
